माफ गर्नुहोस्, यो नेपालीमा उपलव्ध छैन।

As Pakistan battles the ferocious waves of its angry rivers, Mirza Asif Baig, chairman of the Indus Water Commission (IWC), argues the destruction of the floods could have been averted if the country had invested more in dams.

While Pakistan is currently wracked by floods, for most of the year the arid country has little rain. This year’s floods have killed almost 500 people in Pakistan and Indian administered Kashmir, displaced hundreds of thousands more and destroyed swathes of cotton crops. But most of the water dumped during the monsoon deluge will be wasted.

Baig laments the loss of the “precious resource” and believes the answer lies in building big dams on the Indus River. But big dams have become a politically charged issue. “The sensitivity leant to the dam issue has damaged the national point of view,” he told thethirdpole.net.

In May this year, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif gave the green light for construction of the 4,500-megawatt Diamer-Bhasha Dam and the 2,000 megawatt Dasu Hydropower Project on the Indus river.

Akhtar Ali, a water specialist at the Asian Development Bank believes these new reservoirs are crucial, given the country’s looming water and energy crises, against a backdrop of rapid urbanisation, population growth, food insecurity and growing water demand from industry.

“Dams facilitate water regulation; it is up to us how we manage that,” he said. “The increased storage capacity from building new reservoirs could store floodwater for productive use and lessen flood peaks downstream,” he added.

Dams also provide valuable water storage for agriculture, Baig pointed out. “If we can control water by investing in big dams we can overcome the electricity crisis and improve our agriculture.”

The Indus basin irrigates about 14 million hectares of land in Pakistan – the largest irrigated area in the world – for which a huge amount of water is needed. With only two existing major reservoirs in the Indus basin – the Mangla and Tarbela – the storage capacity of Pakistan is only about 30 days, while most of the developed countries have 1-2 years water storage capability.

Pakistan is fast becoming a water scarce country. “Pakistan’s per capita water availability is presently estimated at 950 cubic metres, quite a dip from 5,500 cubic metres in 1951,” said Ghulam Rasul, deputy director general of the Pakistan Meteorological Department. “If we continue business as usual, how will we meet the water needs of a growing population?”

However, not everyone agrees that dams are the best solution. Professor Mushtaq Mirani, director of the Centre of Engineering and Development at the Mehran University of Engineering and Technology in Sindh province, believes dam proponents fail to take into account the hydrologic changes that may result from building dams.

“The conversation about dams takes place after every flood,” he said, but most dam proponents come from the upstream Punjab province. The Kalabagh dam, a hydroelectric project planned on the Indus River in Punjab has been a bone of contention for over three decades. It has strong support in Punjab, Pakistan’s largest province, but Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa fiercely oppose the 3,600 megawatt dam which they argue would give Punjab control over their water.

“Before a big dam has to be built, one has to understand the natural flow regime very carefully as dams can heavily modify the volume of water flowing downstream,” Mirani, also an engineer, pointed out.

Mirani, an opponent of big dams, says construction of big reservoirs require huge investment, displacement of local communities and loss of rich biodiversity.

Others fear big dams could become easy targets for militants, as the Mosul dam recently became in Iraq.

A recent study from Oxford University’s Said Business School concluded that mega dams are not economically viable and come at great human and ecological cost.  Little independent research on the viability of large dams has been carried out since the findings of the World Commission on Dams in 2000. And by 2000, the number of large dams had climbed to more than 47,000, and an additional 800,000 smaller dams blocked the flow of the world’s rivers.

The Oxford study, based on data from 245 large dams in 65 countries, claims dam building has burdened countries with large amounts of debt. It argues “smaller, more flexible hydroelectric projects” built faster should be the preferred choice. After a decade-long “lull” in dam building, emerging economies of Brazil, China, Ethiopia and Pakistan among others are rushing to build mega-dams on an unprecedented scale, the report claims.

Dams not the only solution

Shafqat Kakakhel, former ambassador and former official of the United Nations Environment Programme, argues big dams are “not the only or the best solution for diverting and storing flood water. Dams of various sizes should be seen as one of the numerous interventions for managing the kind of floods that we have seen in recent years and are likely to experience in future thanks to climate change and other factors.”

Mirani insists that before building dams Pakistan needs to put its irrigation system in order. “We waste nearly 60% of water because of our outdated canal and irrigation system. In addition, we still practise flood irrigation when we should be turning towards controlled irrigation.” He claims Pakistan has enough water even to divert it towards the drought-stricken Thar desert, the Indus delta where sea water intrusion is destroying swathes of agricultural land or even to urban centres like Karachi, which is experiencing water shortages.

The benefits and challenges of each project need to be weighed up. “I acknowledge the plight of the communities displaced by huge dams,” said Kakakhel. “But we also need to look at the enormous benefits of the Three Gorges Project such as production of huge quantity of electricity and controlling floods in the Yangtze basin,” he said.

Often hydropower supplies cities while communities close to the project remain in the dark. Kakakhel agrees, citing the example of Kashmiris, in Indian-administered part of Kashmir, who complain that while dams use their water and land to generate power for the rest of India, the valley itself frequently suffers from black-outs of the type endured by Pakistanis. “But such complaints can be addressed without abandoning a hydropower project that is otherwise necessary,” he added.

Kakakhel still favours dams over solar and wind energy, since multi-purpose dams do “much more than electricity generation” as seen in the case of the Tarbela and Mangla dams “which expanded cultivable areas”.

7 comments

  1. Ghulam Qadir Shah |

    In order to manage floods and regulate flows of water a series of small dams is required not the controversial big ones, as argued by Mr. Kakakhel. This time the floods in Kashmir and Punjab have largely been generated due to heavy rainfall in the catchment of eastern rivers, not in the catchment of Indus River. Unfortunately, we tend not to think out of box.

  2. I doubt the World Bank will do funding for Kalabagh dam. I have written several stories in the Guardian newspaper, fortnightly Down to Earth, India and in The News International on this issue. They can be googled. I support the view of Mirani.
    Shahid Husain

  3. There is material defect in this article and many more coming up these days by non professionals. The main issue is that no matter how many dams you build on the Indus this flood comes from the Chenab and Ravi rivers, also the dead rivers Beas and Sutluj have become alive. The Beas and Sutluj were dried by similar experts who negotiated the Indus Water Treaty in the 1960s. Playing with nature will bounce back as it did this time. The author should have in fact tocuhed environmental issues like free flow of waters across political frontiers also makes room for alien invasive species to spread as it happened in the 1992 floods when fishes of the Ganga managed to come to the Indus.
    The viewpoint of Mr Mirani quoted as an expert by the author are also a joke, not realizing that the figure of 60 percent water is wasted in Pakistan is not correct. By lining the water courses it turned out that we have stopped water percolation and thus there is no sweet water underground this water was vital for kharif crops by tubelwell irrigation. So without building dams lots of water was stored underground. A holistic approach is needed and not as mypic as is in this story

  4. Please see the Chinese experiences in the Yangze and Mekong river basins. Through flood plain management underground water is stored by spreading the floods over large areas. Floods also bring in nutrients and silt so good for sustainable agriculture. Flood waters also flush polluted lakes and ponds. We must have many small and big wetlands to allow soaking of flood waters. and slow release that is good for mangrove forests. The Ministry of Climate change has done wonderful work by launching the Ramsar Advisory Mission and is now working to implement its recommendations. Please see the Ramsar website and then opine if floods are good or bad for Pakistan.
    Wetlands have so much economic and environmental value in addition to their ability to absorb extra flood waters. Due to land hunger the trend of drying wetlands for agriculture is a major problem and when floods come we forget that why did we build towns on the path of floods. We need floodplain management as the most economic tool and not waste tins of money on dams

    1. After Mirani Saheb, Nasir Saheb speaks sensibly. But so much money is involved in mega dams and huge barrages that even honest persons are tempted to let go of their intelligence. In addition, both politicians and bureaucrats of Islamabad are interested in expanding their power of patronage – but the reverse would happen with decentralised water storage. What I fail to understand is the absence of serious discussion of underground storage through various measures for rainwater harvesting, much cheaper than anything else except wasteful farming, and autonomous to boot. Its like decentralised solar energy vs huge centralised generation and wasteful transmission lines — corruption is easily hidden in the latter!

  5. A Pakistan Wetlands project was managed by WWF and they spent 12 m US $ specifically for this purpose of wetlands and flood plain management. But except for a few reports tht were not made public there is nothing on ground.

जवाफ लेख्नुहोस्

तपाईंको ईमेल ठेगाना प्रकाशित हुने छैन । आवश्यक ठाउँमा * चिन्ह लगाइएको छ

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.