A small brown rodent, the Bramble Cay melomys, in Australia became the first mammal to go extinct due to human-driven climate change. The detail was in an announcement by the Australian environment minister, hidden in footnote in a release about ten threatened species. The extinction did not come as a surprise. A detailed survey carried out in 2014 had found no evidence of the little mammal in its small range of 4 hectares (40,000 square metres), and had suggested it be declared ‘Possibly Extinct’. Some reports suggest that it was already considered extinct in 2016.

The proximate cause of the extinction is the destruction of the habitat due to sea rise and flooding. This is directly caused by human-induced climate change that has warmed our earth as carbon emissions over the last two centuries. Humanity has driven this little rodent to extinction.

This event should be a wake up call for people across the globes, but in particular for the countries that border the Hindu Kush Himalayan (HKH) region. The HKH region is warming faster than the plains, with large impacts on the ecosystems, and biodiversity. It is also one of the richest biodiversity spots on the planet, and that biodiversity is critically dependent on a habitat that is rapidly undergoing change to both climate change and human intervention.

See: Biodiversity of Hindu Kush Himalayas will plummet by 2100

The signs of climate change and habitat endangering vulnerable species are already clear. In Nepal’s national parks conservation experts are struggling to respond to new, invasive species of weeds that are wiping out the grasslands upon which the one-horned rhinoceros feeds. More critically, long dry spells, an outcome of weather fluctuations brought out by climate change, means that water bodies and mudholes dry up. The rhinoceros wallows in these to maintain its body temperature, to keep itself from overheating, but as the wetlands dry up in its habitat, the signature animal is under increasing physical threat.

See: Rhino numbers recover, but new threats emerge

Moving beyond signature species

In point of fact it is not the signature species that are most likely to be wiped out. They are known, and celebrated, and when they are threatened, countries feel the pressure to act. In India, the national animal, the tiger, has seen its numbers recover after decades of effort despite the ever present threats of poaching and habitat loss. The snow leopard, another signature species, has been under threat for decades, but 12 countries across the vast landscape the elusive cat inhabits have come together to try and save the big cat.

See: Saving the elusive snow leopard

It is the small species, with limited habitats, like the Bramble Cay melomys, that are most likely to disappear, not to mention insects, birdlife, and flora. A major report released last week suggested that nearly a third of all insects are disappearing, with its authors noting, “We are witnessing the largest extinction event on Earth since the late Permian and Cretaceous periods.”

Despite the 240 million people living in the HKH region, many species have not been formally ‘discovered’. As the ICIMOD assessment report notes, about 35 new species were discovered every year in the Eastern Himalayan region between 1998 and 2008. In 2016 a frog thought to be extinct, and a rare songbird, were both discovered in the Eastern Himalayas.

See: Rare frog and bird species found in Eastern Himalayas

But the fate of the Bramble Cay melomys offers additional lessons as well, ones that could be utilised for the HKH region to deal with the challenge that is before us. The first and most important lesson is that we cannot save a species if we do not know it exists and where it is to be found. The eight states of the HKH region – Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, China, Bhutan, Nepal, Bangladesh and Myanmar – many of whom have vested interests in tourism, urgently need to make the discovery of species and mapping their habitats a common concern. Since a number of these species will have transboundary ranges, their preservation will need cooperation across borders.

Reversing habitat loss

Secondly, the key loss here was of habitat. As glaciers retreat, permafrost is exposed, and precipitation becomes more uneven, the ecosystems will face multiple threats. Human intervention – such as large scale infrastructure projects, whether hydropower dams, roads, or the many interventions of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, can be designed to supplement and support some of these habitats rather than harm them. The current environmental assessments in the HKH region tend to be either narrow, or inadequate. They have historically excluded local people – those who know the flora and fauna of their terrain best, and have the best local knowledge. This will have to change, and quickly, to incorporate local knowledge, and not just be directed to avoid harm, but actively build resilience in mountain communities.

Cascading impacts

Lastly, we need to understand how these animals, birds, insects, and plants interact with each other. The loss of a rodent may mean little, or it may mean much, depending on how its presence affects the wider ecosystem. In the case of the Bramble Cay melomys, which was in a small ecosystem, the extinction may have limited impact. On the other hand the global collapse of bee populations, and the death of vultures in India due to a chemical injection given to cattle, have had far-reaching impacts. We need to understand what it is we are losing.

The HKH region is a set of mountains surrounded by plains. In a way, like the Arctic, it is one system. A change in one part will, inevitably, affect other parts, especially when it comes to highly mobile fauna. As the extinction of this tiny rodent illustrates, the Anthropocene is here, and it is costing lives. How long will we continue to ignore it?

One comment

  1. Low water flows in rivers is reality but totally ignored by the policy makers. Scientists are largely silent on this serious issue. Very huge money continue to be earmarked for construction of dams, lift irrigation projects, check dams, contour bunds, farm ponds etc., inspite of the evident fact that water availability is drastically reduced. Most of the rivers, streams & water bodies have turned influent or disconnected. Till today, empirical methodologies are being used in assessing water resources which are all based on basic assumption that rivers are still effluent. But in reality rivers in the country, especially in arid & semiarid areas have turned influent thus making the water resource assesment methodologies redundant. Reality is far more different than the accepted prevailing scientific understanding. No serious concern appears around us in the world we live.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.