Pakistan’s Gilgit-Baltistan region is frequently in the news these days and it is not for its mouth-watering cherries and dried apricots. The much touted USD 46 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) will be passing through this beautiful province in the north to reach the Chinese operated Gwadar port in the south of the country, leading to hopes that it will transform the economy and help bridge Pakistan’s power shortfall but also triggering concern that the local people might be left out of the gains.

To be built over the next several years, the 3,218 kilometre route will connect Kashgar in China’s western Xinjiang region to the port of Gwadar. Currently nearly 80% of China’s oil is transported by ship from the Strait of Malacca to Shanghai, a distance of more than 16,000 kilometres, with the journey taking between two to three months. But once Gwadar begins operating, the distance would be reduced to less than 5,000 kilometres.

If all goes well and on schedule, of the 21 agreements on energy – including gas, coal and solar energy – 14 will be able to provide up to 10, 400 MW of energy by March 2018, to make up for the 2015 energy shortfall of 4,500 MW. According to China Daily these projects should provide up to 16, 400 MW of energy altogether.

Businessmen like Milad-us-Salman, who belongs to Gilgit-Baltistan and exports fresh fruits like cherries, apricots and apples, is hoping that CPEC would be a game-changer for the region. So far, the carefully packaged truckloads of fruit traverse the rundown Karakoram highway to reach the national capital Islamabad, from where they are flown to Qatar, Abu Dhabi and Dubai. Last year, his company, Karakoram  Natural Resources Pvt. Ltd., sold fruit worth PKR 20 million (USD 190,000). “We sold 30 tonnes of cherries and 100 tonnes of apples,” Salman told thethirdpole.net from Gilgit.

Hopes and doubts

With the CPEC passing through Gilgit-Baltistan, Salman is hoping the route would open business opportunities for people of the region.

Diverting fruit to China would be more profitable, he said. “We can double our sales and profits if we can sell to China where cherries are very popular.” he said. “We air cargo our produce to Dubai, but it would be faster and cheaper if we could send it by road to China via Xinjiang as we can get a one-year border pass to travel within that border.”

According to the Asian Development Bank (ADB), Gilgit-Baltistan produces over 100,000 metric tonnes of fresh apricots annually. While there are no official surveys, Zulfiqar Momin, who heads Farm House Pvt Ltd., which exports fresh and dried fruits to the Middle East, estimates that Gilgit-Baltistan produces up to 4,000 tonnes of cherries and up to 20,000 tonnes of apples. “All fruits grown in Gilgit-Baltistan are organic with no pesticides used,” he said.

An apple in Hunza, grown organically [image by Ghulam Rasool]

An apple in Hunza, grown organically [image by Ghulam Rasool]

The CPEC, some believe, will also boost tourism to the 73,000 square kilometre region, which is a mountaineer’s paradise and is home to five of the ‘eight-thousanders’ (peaks above 8,000 metres) as well as more than 50 mountains over 7,000 metres besides being home to the world’s second highest peak K2 and the Nanga Parbat.

But development consultant Izhar Hunzai, who also belongs to the area, has no such expectations. The CPEC, he feels, is nothing more than a “black hole” as far as the people of the region are concerned.

“The government has not engaged with us; we do not know exactly how much or what Gilgit-Baltistan’s role will be in CPEC or how we will benefit from it,” he said.

While both Pakistan and China will benefit through this region, his people will be left “selling eggs”. “I fear when the region opens up, it will give short shrift to the locals.”

Land of opportunities

But it does not have to be this way. According to Hunzai, the region has infinite water resources to tap. “By building hydropower projects, Pakistan can sell clean energy to China and even use it for itself. If Bhutan can sell to India, why can’t we sell to China?” he asked, and pointed out that the Chinese were already taking the country’s national grid to its border province.

It made little sense to him that the Pakistan government wanted to buy 1,000 MW of hydropower from Tajikistan under the Central Asia South Asia (CASA-1000) project and construct an expensive 750 kilometre transmission line when the resource was right there in the country’s own backyard.

However, the government is almost ready to revive the Diamer-Bhasha dam, a gravity dam on the Indus river in Gilgit-Baltistan, in the second phase of CPEC. Once completed, it would generate 4,500 MW of electricity besides serving as a huge water reservoir for the country.

Naltar lake, 40 kms from Gilgit [image by Ghulam Rasool]

Naltar lake, 40 kms from Gilgit [image by Ghulam Rasool]

Hunzai also lamented the government’s decision of buying discarded coal powered plants from China and using imported coal to run it. Doing some quick back-of-the-envelope calculations, he asked, “Why produce 22 cents per unit electricity from imported fuel and sell it to the people at a subsidised rate of 15 cents. Why not make electricity from hydropower which would cost just 0.02 cents?”

According to the ADB, Gilgit-Baltistan has the potential to produce nearly 50,000 MW of energy. Just Bunji Dam, a run-of-the-river project that the ADB has invested in, can generate up to 7,100 MW electricity when completed.

The government is not wilfully neglecting the region, countered long-time hydropower advocate Tahir Dhindsa of the Islamabad-based Sustainable Development Policy Institute. Instead the problem is more about the profits that middlemen make. It is all about the “kickbacks and commissions” that one can earn quickly from “cheap and carbon spewing coal power plants” compared to almost none from hydropower projects that can take up to 10 years or more.

“The future is renewables as has been reiterated in Paris at the COP21 and Pakistan should seriously be thinking about its future course of action,” he said.

Demographic shift

There is also the fear that the CPEC may lead to widespread displacement of the locals. “Of the 73,000 square kilometres, cultivable land is just 1%. If that is also swallowed by rich investors from outside, we will become a minority and economically subservient once there will be no farmland or orchards left to earn our livelihood from,” said Hunzai.

Local farmer with his yaks in Skardu [image by Ghulam Rasool]

Local farmer with his yaks in Skardu [image by Ghulam Rasool]

He is not the only one. Given the secrecy and confusion surrounding the project, its design and its budgetary allocation, three of Pakistan’s four provinces recently held a well attended All Parties Conference (APC) and vented their anger at the central government for its opaqueness regarding the share of investments for each of the provinces.

“CPEC is not the problem. It has just highlighted the imbalance in provinces with the largest one – Punjab – being seen as favoured specially as far as investments on road infrastructure is concerned and fuelling bitterness among the rest of the three provinces,” rued Vaqar Zakaria, an energy expert heading Hagler Bailley.

Trying to address the concerns of the provinces soon after the APC, federal minister for planning, Ahsan Iqbal, who heads the Planning Commission of Pakistan, said in a television interview that this was not a time for scoring political points by making the project controversial. CPEC, he said, was not a project to benefit a party or a government as was being portrayed by politicians and the media but to the entire country. Of the USD 46 billion, between USD 35 to 38 billion were earmarked for the energy sector – of this, USD 11.6 billion would be invested in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, USD 11.5 billion in Sindh, USD 7.1 billion in Balochistan and USD 6.9 billion in Punjab.

Beijing has urged Islamabad to resolve the internal differences on the CPEC to create favourable working conditions for the project to be rolled out smoothly.

4 comments

  1. Unfortunately true cost of electricity produced from dams is never provided by the hydropower lobby. Lakes behind all dams produce methane – a gas 20 times more potent than CO2 in causing greenhouse effect. The environmental damage, loss of biodiversity all the way to delta and other downstream cost are never factored in into the price of power produced by dams. And above all, large dams in a magnitude 8.0 earth quake region are ticking time bombs. Whatever we do, we need to plan it very very carefully in the shaking mountains of Karakoram and Himalayas, and not ignore, as well, the downstream human cultures and the ecological systems.

  2. There should be a balanced analysis of gains and risks of hydro power projects and even bringing the investment for such projects should be strategically analyzed, besides considering seismic sensitivities as mentioned by Dr. Abbas . The e flow ( Ecological Flow) is a factor often ignored by the development authorities, we have some visible effects of such ignorant handling, which resulted in fragmentation of habitat and even loss of some precious species, Palla fish is one such example.

  3. Pingback: China pakistan economic corridor a boon for the economy a bane for locals – PK News Portal

  4. Pingback: China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: A boon for the economy, a bane for locals - My Pakistan

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *