Since September 28, the Committee on Agriculture of the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization has been conducting its 27th session virtually. For this session, people from across the world have come together to petition the UN to declare 2026 an International Year for Rangelands and Pastoralists (IYRP).

Nearly half the land area of the Earth is classified as rangeland. The proposal states that an IYRP would “raise awareness on the importance of rangelands and pastoralists for livelihoods, healthy ecosystems and other relevant dimensions of sustainable development.” The decision could also pressure governments to implement policies that stop pastoralists’ political marginalisation, and ensure they are consulted on management of the land.

Yurt belonging to semi nomadic pastoralists in the Pamir region in Kyrgyzstan [image: Alamy]

The government of Mongolia took the lead, and the governments of Ethiopia, Afghanistan and Spain have sent letters in support of the proposal. So far, 12 governments and 133 organisations have supported it. In South Asia, groups of pastoralists are mobilising behind the idea. Voting on the proposal is scheduled for October 1.

See: Pakistan’s centuries-old Bakarwal community faces dual threat

“Pastoralism is just not recognised,” said Hanwant Singh Rathore, director of the Lokhit Pashu-Palak Sansthan (Society to Aid Pastoralists) based in the Pali district of the Indian state of Rajasthan. He has been working with the camel-herding Raika community for 30 years, and has observed that governments behave as though the herders do not exist.

In 1988, the Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary was created in Rajasthan over about 600 square kilometres of land. When the Raika moved with their herds along the routes they had been taking for generations, they were told they could no longer allow their animals to graze in those lands – the forest area was “protected” from their animals. No prior notification had been given to them, and they were not consulted. Because the Raika are on the move for about nine months a year, they are hard to contact – even for policymakers.

A camel herder drives a herd through the Thar Desert towards Pushkar for the annual trade fair, Rajasthan, India [image: Alamy]

But aside from this logistical difficulty, the neglect of pastoralists stems from a lack of understanding of their role in maintaining ecosystems, which is only now being documented. The herds that pastoralists tend have been found to reduce the chance of forest fires by reducing biomass; similarly the services of pastoral communities in seed dispersal, soil fertility and biodiversity is only beginning to be understood.

Their customs often emphasise striking a balance with nature, because their lives are dependent on the ecosystem. For example, among the Changpa – a community that herds the famous pashmina goats on the India-China border – water is carefully conserved. Water used to wash hair is carefully saved to be reused; nothing is ever wasted and everything is a “resource”.

Dinesh Rebari works with the Maldhari Vikas Sangathan in Gujarat, India, a non-governmental organisation working on issues affecting pastoral communities. A pastoralist himself, he said these traditional practices, and the knowledge behind them, should ideally feed into government policymaking. “We need easy access to common lands and rangelands, we need to be able to use these resources, and our voices should be heeded in their management. These are not demands that would serve only the pastoral communities, these are demands that would conserve these rangelands and help us preserve them for generations to come,” he said. He said he hoped that the UN will declare a special IYRP.

Adaptive practices of pastoralists rarely make it into the books of “official knowledge” [image by: Ilse Köhler-Rollefson]

A range of problems

At a meeting of pastoral communities in Gujarat in 2015, Anu Verma, who works with the South Asia Pastoralist Alliance, reported that such communities across the world are under stress. Many are forced to withdraw from traditional livestock keeping as the lands they earlier had free access to have been acquired by governments or privatised. Mechanised technology in agriculture has meant vast expansion in settled agricultural production, to the detriment of rangelands.

For communities that migrate across national boundaries, there are additional worries. The Maldharis of Afghanistan used to move into Pakistan in the winter, but war and instability have limited this. Their route is now heavily policed, and documents such as passports and identity cards are required for crossing the border, which pastoral people often do not have.

See: Pakistan’s centuries-old Bakarwal community faces dual threat

Many South Asian pastoral communities travel from the cold Himalayan deserts to the dry lands of the arid southern deserts. They raise and live with, camels, yaks, buffaloes, sheep, goats, horses and donkeys.  In recent years, groups of pastoralists from India, Afghanistan and Nepal have started to collaborate, comparing notes and attempting to collectively pressure their national governments to draft policy in their favour. This group, which has come together under the umbrella of the South Asia Pastoralist Alliance in the past two years, has begun mapping rangelands and the pastoralists in these areas. It is set to expand to include members from Bhutan and Bangladesh.

The Alliance estimates that 173 million acres in India is rangeland, and up to 75% of India’s rural population depends on such lands. In the past three decades, non-recognition of the traditional rights of pastoral communities and indigenous peoples has caused such lands to be taken over for other purposes.

2011 judgement of India’s Supreme Court mentioned this loss of common grazing lands: “What we have witnessed since Independence, however, is that in large parts of the country this common village land has been grabbed by unscrupulous persons using muscle power, money power or political clout, and in many States now there is not an inch of such land left for the common use of the people of the village, though it may exist on paper. People with power and pelf [money] operating in villages all over India systematically encroached upon communal lands and put them to uses totally inconsistent with its original character, for personal aggrandizement at the cost of the village community.”

Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, a scientist, researcher and activist who has worked with the camel herders of Rajasthan for over two decades, noted that pastoralism is poorly documented in India. Unlike in Africa, for instance, where pastoral people form distinct tribes, the pastoral communities of India are often intertwined in social interactions with caste groups.

Pastoralists are poorly documented in India [image by: Ilse Köhler-Rollefson]

This often means their specific needs are overlooked. During the abrupt lockdown imposed by the Indian government in March to prevent the spread of Covid-19, these communities were especially affected. It is also pastoral nomads who are most impacted when hostilities break out between nations over border disputes. The recent clashes between India and China occurred during the breeding season of the goats that produce pashmina wool, and Changpa herders of Ladakh found their flocks depleted as they were pushed out of traditional herding grounds.

See: Will border disputes in the Himalayas affect climate research?

Invisible to the government

Government provisioning for the poor does not include nomadic pastoral people; most documents for access to government services require a fixed address. The mobile nature of their lives also means that schooling becomes difficult, with pastoral communities have lower levels of literacy than others.

See: Photo essay: Bakarwals of Jammu & Kashmir

Despite their marginalisation, though, researchers have documented the resilience of their social structures and the close ties that help them through hard times. Nandita Chaudhary is a former academic at the University of Delhi’s Department of Human Development and Childhood Studies. Writing about the Changpa shepherds, Chaudhary noted how children in the community closely bond with the animals, often snuggling up with the goats for warmth. Such communities have also developed their own medicinal practices for the animals they live in close contact with. These are often based on herbs found in the rangeland, but they are not documented or recognised by standard veterinarians.

The populations of pastoral communities in India have not been counted for decades. Pre-independence census records documented the numbers of some groups that were recorded as caste groups. However, the caste census was discontinued after independence; it was undertaken again in 2011, but pastoral communities were not counted as part of this. There are thus no estimates of the number of people engaged in pastoral activity in India.

Pastoralists and academics say that the IYRP could open up more conversations, and that both government policy and long-term nature conservation can be informed by the traditional practices and knowledge of communities. It seems as if governments are listening: 13 governments have supported the initiative, and on September 28 Ulrich Seidenberger, the German permanent representative to the FAO, tweeted support on behalf of both Germany and the EU.

 

Rosamma Thomas is a freelance journalist based in Pune, India; she is on twitter as @rosammat

One comment

  1. The author seems to be overoptimistic stating that “The decision could also pressure governments to implement policies that stop pastoralists’ political marginalisation, and ensure they are consulted on management of the land.”
    The reason for caution are policies of Mongolia, where government fully understands the role of pastoralists and thus initiated this “Year of Pastoralism”. For many years human rights and environmental CSOs of Mongolia and many community leaders fight to grant indigenous status and right to FPIC (free-prioir informed consent) to the country’s remaining nomadic communities. It is necessary, because mining companies encroach upon traditionally used lands harm water sources and deprive local people from the environment on which their livelihoods depend. For years and years Mongolian government refuses to recognize its pastoralists as having right to decide what happens to their rangelands. Once in 2013 this resulted in massive attack on CSOs protecting rights of locals protesting gold mining in riverbeds and jailing of their leaders as “ecological terrorists” with 20-year prison terms (this unjust sentence was reversed by presidential pardon in two years, but one of leader died before that date). (For detail see http://www.transrivers.org/documents/rivers-and-mining/the-short-history-of-the-law-with-long-name/)
    So, as long as this international move is presided by Mongolian government, I would not be very optimistic about the chances of local pastoralists to gain more weight in deciding what happens with their lands and waters as a result of celebration of the “Year of Pastoralism”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.